Julio Trigman Reacts To Impeachment Annoucement

Less than an hour after Guardian Ardalia annouced the impeachment and removal of Julio Trigman from his Guardian position, Trigman is striking back with claims that the Guardians don't know the definition of impeachment, claiming it is grounds for a trial, but not grounds for removal as well as complaining that he didn't get the chance to defend himself.

Farlane & Ardalia struck back, claiming that the Articles didn't define impeachment in that manner, that Trigman (who wrote most of the Articles) should have thought of that before he pushed for the adoption of the documents and suggested that Trigman was just being sore at his removal.

Trigman demanded to know where in the Articles it said that Guardians could simply vote to remove a member without due process, and when Four Hectares produced the relavent quotes, Trigman responded saying that had to do with the trial and did not constitute the authorization of direct removal.

Trigman has also been acting very savagely towards the other Guardians, telling them in no uncertain terms to 'go to hell'. This was not taken lightly and Farlane has threatened to charge him with Profanity Use unless he calms down.

This has been Tim Kotula, reporting for LNS.